+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Should I raise my TA now?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,210

    Default Re: Should I raise my TA now?

    Larry,

    Every pound (which is about a cup) of 20 Mule Team Borax requires about 7.7 ounces of Muriatic Acid (31.45% HCl) to keep the pH the same so you can add one and then the other in smaller quantities to keep the pH more stable (you don't mix them together, of course, you just put them into the pool one after the other).

    For your size pool it would take 1219 ounces or about 76.2 pounds of 20 Mule Team Borax which is about 16 boxes. It would take about 582 ounces of Muriatic acid to keep the pH the same after adding the Borax. Of course, you should add about half of each of these amount (alternating in smaller additions of each) and then measure your Borates level on the test strip just to be sure you don't go to far and that my calculations were correct.

    Richard

  2. #2
    giroup01 is offline Registered+ Thread Analyst giroup01 0
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    77

    Default Re: Should I raise my TA now?

    What is the BleachCalc using as borax concentration, or maybe I should be asking if the borax concentration in BleachCalc is the same as the 20 Mule product, the software says 338 ounces in 20700 gallons gets you 49.9 ppm. Just wondering.

    And many thanks Richard for your last reply on my high TA/pH drift question!!
    Last edited by giroup01; 02-11-2007 at 10:36 PM.
    Reseller of Taylor water-testing products for Canada

  3. #3
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,210

    Default Re: Should I raise my TA now?

    Evan (waterbear) and I figured out what the proper interpretation of "ppm Borates" means and it turns out to be ppm of Boron, not tetraborate or boric acid or anything else. BleachCalc was not using that convention so would produce the wrong result. I believe there is more about this in The Great Tetraborate Experiment thread.

    Richard

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts