I run firfox on PC. I even copy and pasted the link
http://richardfalk.home.comcast.net/pool/FC.htm
and got "can not find server"
I can get to his site
http://home.comcast.net/~richardfalk...tml--logo.html
but not to the links with firefox!!
amir
I run firfox on PC. I even copy and pasted the link
http://richardfalk.home.comcast.net/pool/FC.htm
and got "can not find server"
I can get to his site
http://home.comcast.net/~richardfalk...tml--logo.html
but not to the links with firefox!!
amir
Amir,
Just for the heck of it, I duplicated the FC.htm file and changed the name to FC.html so see if this link is accessible. If it is, then Firefox on the PC requires the extension to be "html" instead if "htm". Let me know.
Richard
I am running Firefox v2.0.0.2 on a pc and I am able to pull up the pages that only have the .htm extensions.
Sal
Richard,
yes, the link was accessible. you are right it needs html. I guess 90% of the world uses IE so I am used to finding a way around or going to IE when nothing works.
Thanks
Amir
Thanks Amir. Well, I think this should be logged as a bug against Firefox on Windows. I could change all the HTML files I've uploaded, but would need two versions so as not to break old links. I think getting Firefox fixed would be better, especially since it works on Mac OS X and Linux. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Richard
Richard,
I've been lurking(mostly) here for several years. You and many others have helped this new owner of a 25 yr. old IG plaster pool tremendously.
My pH has always tended to stay at the upper limit of the standard test kit. I usually let it run about 8.0, and don't do anything until it is clearly above 8.2. From memory (because my test results are at home, my TA is about 100-120. I have put about 40 lbs of borax in the pool (30,000 gal.)
This year, though, I have needed much more acid than before to keep it down. I think I'm starting my 7th gallon since opening in early April--more than I usually use in the whole season.
Rain isn't the problem here--East Tennessee is in the middle of the worst drought in 120 years. My refill water, from a well, tests at pH 6.8.
My chemistry degree was 25 years ago, and I no longer work in that field so I'm a bit rusty, but I look up the pKa of carbonate buffer, and find it is 6.35 & 10.33 with a useful buffering range of 6.0 - 8.0 and 9.5 - 11.0. For Borate, the pKa is 9.23 with a useful range of 8.5 - 10.2.
I assume the lower pKa for carbonate is the bicarbonate state, and the higher for the carbonate.
What I can't understand is how a borate addition would _decrease_ the number at which the buffer tends to hold the pH--since its active buffering range is higher than that of carbonate.
What am I missing?
As an aside, can anyone point to current, accurate resources for operating at higher pH levels? I have the info from the older Pool Solutions site, but wondered if there's anything more up to date.
Chuck
Buffers do not move pH. The pKa numbers for the buffer simply indicate the pH at which half of each of the two species on either side of the pKa equilibrium equation are equal to each other and is the point of maximum buffer capacity in each direction. That's all. It is a myth or misconception that all buffers move the pH to their pKa value. After all, the pKa for the carbonate buffer is 6.3 and 10.3 yet the pH that pools will migrate towards depends on the TA level. If the TA is 100, then outgassing to equilibrium with the air will result in a pH of about 8.45 while at a TA of 19 (with CYA of 30 so carbonate alkalinity of 9) the equilibrium pH is 7.50.
In the case of Borates, they do nothing but buffer and have algaecidal properties. In the case of Carbonates, however, they also DO move pH, but it has nothing to do with their buffering capability. It has to do with the fact that they are over-saturated in the water with respect to air so outgassing will occur and that causes the pH to rise with no change in TA (because carbonic acid, which is dissolved carbon dioxide attached to water, is removed and that doesn't contribute to TA but has two hydrogen that are removed by turning them back into water).
So the Borates do not change the equilibrium state for the carbonates vs. carbon dioxide in air so do not change the tendency for the pH rise directly. They ARE an additional pH buffer so the rate of pH rise will be less, but you will still have to add as much acid as you would have without the Borates. IF the Borates kill algae that chlorine doesn't have to and IF you have an SWG, then turning down the SWG level (since you don't need as much chlorine) will lower hydrogen gas bubble production which lowers aeration which lowers carbon dioxide outgassing which lowers the rate of pH rise and amount of acid needed.
So if you are seeing a greater amount of acid you need to add, this has nothing to do with the Borates since they only affect the rate of pH rise for a given amount of outgassing, but do nothing in changing the amount of acid needed per unit time. For whatever reason, your pool is outgassing more carbon dioxide OR you have some other source of base. 40 pounds of Borax is 18 ppm in your 30,000 pool and of course adding that makes pH rise, but I assume you added acid to compensate for that and added the Borax to increase Borates, right? If you added Borax for any other reason, then it would have increased the pH and you would have needed acid to compensate.
Richard
Last edited by chem geek; 06-28-2007 at 03:37 PM.
Bookmarks